Model comparison

GLM-4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 42.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5 Z.ai (Zhipu)

42.0

Rank #122 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 39.0.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $2.20 for GLM-4.5.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

GLM-4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
GLM-4.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Xiaomi
Noometry Index42.048.5
Released2025-07-272026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K1.05M
Max output98K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.60$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$2.20$0.28
Results tracked2719

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

GLM-4.5: 41.4 (#125), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding14341504
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)54.2%—
LMArena WebDev—1637
SciCode—51.3%
WeirdML40.6%—
ALE-Bench344.82—
AlgoTune1.52—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

GLM-4.5: 28.6 (#100), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts14291482
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.9%—
CritPt—12%

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

GLM-4.5: 39.0 (#116), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math14271468
ProofBench—63%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

GLM-4.5: 35.9 (#179), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert14331501
Humanity's Last Exam8.3%—
Confabulations11.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-4.5: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

GLM-4.5: 52.8 (#77), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English14171434
LMArena Chinese14651511
LMArena French14181475
LMArena Russian14141409
LMArena Spanish14541456
LMArena German1407—
LMArena Japanese1415—
LMArena Korean1380—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

GLM-4.5: 74.1 (#104), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14041463

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#201), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query14121463
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

GLM-4.5: 57.5 (#127), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text14301455
LMArena Creative Writing13951400
LMArena Multi-Turn14151451
Short-Story Creative Writing73.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1343—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 42.0 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; GLM-4.5 lists at $0.60 and $2.20.

Is GLM-4.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 41.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5 has 27 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper