Model comparison

Longcat Flash Chat vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 36.5 to 19.0.

Side by side

Longcat Flash Chat and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
Longcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderMeituanXiaomi
Noometry Index42.148.5
Released—2026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked1919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding14711504
LMArena WebDev—1637
SciCode—51.3%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts14401482
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)17.7%—
CritPt—12%

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math14421468
ProofBench—63%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert14541501

Multimodal Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English14041434
LMArena Chinese14651511
LMArena French14561475
LMArena Russian13951409
LMArena Spanish14451456
LMArena German1408—
LMArena Japanese1373—
LMArena Korean1371—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14111463

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query14251463

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text14271455
LMArena Creative Writing13881400
LMArena Multi-Turn14181451

Frequently asked questions

Is Longcat Flash Chat better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Longcat Flash Chat or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 43.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper