Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs phi-3-medium 14B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 42.0 to 9.1.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 44.4 | 29.1 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1516 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97), phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1477 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1516 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1501 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1424 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than phi-3-medium 14B?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and phi-3-medium 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.