Model comparison
phi-3-medium 14B vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 41.8 to 9.1.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1487 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.7% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1483 |
| Adversarial NLI | 55.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 81.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 121.23 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |
Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1474 |
| MATH Level 5 | 17.6% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1489 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 91.6% | — |
| MMLU | 78% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 87.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.9% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1534 |
| LMArena French | — | 1484 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1467 |
Long Context Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1476 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is phi-3-medium 14B better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is phi-3-medium 14B or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do phi-3-medium 14B and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. phi-3-medium 14B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.