Model comparison

Inkling vs phi-3-medium 14B

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Inkling Thinking Machines Lab

44.1

Rank #80 Confirmed

phi-3-medium 14B Microsoft

29.7

Rank #306 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 2 categories and phi-3-medium 14B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling leads 55.1 to 9.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 88.3% for Inkling and 27.6% for phi-3-medium 14B.

Side by side

Inkling and phi-3-medium 14B specifications
Inklingphi-3-medium 14B
ProviderThinking Machines LabMicrosoft
Noometry Index44.129.7
Released2026-07-152024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window66K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.87—
Output $ / M tokens$4.68—
Results tracked4113

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding phi-3-medium 14B leads

Inkling: 34.5 (#234), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingphi-3-medium 14B
FrontierCode14%—
LMArena WebDev1413—
FrontierSWE4.1%—
SciCode47%—
WeirdML32.3%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—37.6%
LMArena Coding1464—
BigCodeBench Complete—48.7%
ALE-Bench946—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Inkling: 29.6 (#85), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingphi-3-medium 14B
APEX-Agents33.8%—
τ²-bench Banking25%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Inkling: 40.4 (#56), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingphi-3-medium 14B
Epoch Capabilities Index148.54121.23
ARC-AGI-236.5%—
SimpleBench50%—
ARC-AGI-179.5%—
CritPt5.4%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1451—
DTBench87.5%—
LMCA37.6%—
Adversarial NLI—55.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—81.4%
HellaSwag—82.4%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Inkling leads

Inkling: 31.3 (#225), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingphi-3-medium 14B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)33.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 44.9%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench0%—
LMArena Math1479—
MATH Level 5—17.6%

Knowledge Inkling leads

Inkling: 55.1 (#49), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingphi-3-medium 14B
GPQA Diamond88.3%27.6%
SimpleQA Verified40.3%—
LMArena Expert1465—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—91.6%
MMLU—78%
OpenBookQA—87.4%
TriviaQA—73.9%

Multilingual Not comparable

Inkling: 54.0 (#52), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Non-English1434—
LMArena Chinese1490—
LMArena French1458—
LMArena German1446—
LMArena Japanese1429—
LMArena Korean1404—
LMArena Russian1429—
LMArena Spanish1448—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Inkling: 75.1 (#71), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Instruction Following1426—

Long Context Not comparable

Inkling: 43.8 (#86), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Longer Query1434—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Inkling: 65.2 (#51), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Text1441—
LMArena Creative Writing1387—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1611—
EQ-Bench 41226—
LMArena Multi-Turn1436—

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Inkling or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Inkling and phi-3-medium 14B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper