Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Palm 2
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Palm 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.1 to 25.6.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Palm 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 48.5 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | 994 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1637 | — |
| SciCode | 51.3% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | 1005 |
| CritPt | 12% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1468 | 1049 |
| ProofBench | 63% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), Palm 2: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), Palm 2: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 887 |
| LMArena French | 1475 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1010 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1010 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | 994 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Palm 2?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Palm 2 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Palm 2 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.