Model comparison

Gemma 7B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 7B Google

30.0

Rank #299 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.1 to 27.1.

Side by side

Gemma 7B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
Gemma 7BMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderGoogleXiaomi
Noometry Index30.048.5
Released2024-02-212026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked2719

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding10481504
LMArena WebDev—1637
SciCode—51.3%
HumanEval+28.7%—
MBPP+43.4%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts10421482
CritPt—12%
Adversarial NLI48.7%—
BIG-Bench Hard55.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index111.99—
HellaSwag82.2%—
PIQA81.2%—
WinoGrande79%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math10661468
ProofBench—63%
GSM8K46.4%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert10011501
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ83.2%—
MMLU66.1%—
OpenBookQA78.6%—
TriviaQA72.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English9991434
LMArena Chinese10351511
LMArena French10251475
LMArena Russian9931409
LMArena Spanish—1456

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following10171463

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query10221463

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text10561455
LMArena Creative Writing10241400
LMArena Multi-Turn9631451

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 7B better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 7B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper