Model comparison

Magistral Small vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Small Mistral AI

30.2

Rank #296 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Small scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 36.5 to 6.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 35.2% for Magistral Small and 51.3% for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $1.50 for Magistral Small.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Magistral Small and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
Magistral SmallMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderMistral AIXiaomi
Noometry Index30.248.5
Released2025-06-102026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K1.05M
Max output40K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$1.50$0.28
Results tracked1019

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2.6-Flash
SciCode35.2%51.3%
LMArena WebDev—1637
LMArena Coding—1504

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2.6-Flash
CritPt0.3%12%
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark6.3%—
ARC-AGI-15%—
Chess Puzzles3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1482
DTBench61.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index133.19—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2.6-Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202530%—
ProofBench—63%
LMArena Math—1468

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2.6-Flash
GPQA Diamond56.1%—
LMArena Expert—1501

Multimodal Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English—1434
LMArena Chinese—1511
LMArena French—1475
LMArena Russian—1409
LMArena Spanish—1456

Instruction Following Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following—1463

Long Context Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1463

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text—1455
LMArena Creative Writing—1400
LMArena Multi-Turn—1451

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Small better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Small or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Magistral Small lists at $0.50 and $1.50.

Is Magistral Small or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper