Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Muse Glimmer

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.7

Rank #131 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Muse Glimmer in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 38.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 12% for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and 2.6% for Muse Glimmer.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Glimmer specifications
MiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Glimmer
ProviderXiaomiMeta
Noometry Index48.541.7
Released2026-09-212026-08-10
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.14—
Output $ / M tokens$0.28—
Results tracked1915

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Glimmer
LMArena WebDev16371355
SciCode51.3%44.9%
LMArena Coding15041416

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Glimmer
CritPt12%2.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts14821396

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Glimmer
LMArena Math14681417
ProofBench63%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Glimmer
LMArena Expert15011386

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), Muse Glimmer: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Glimmer
LMArena Vision1259—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Glimmer
LMArena Non-English14341384
LMArena Chinese15111412
LMArena Russian14091390
LMArena French1475—
LMArena Spanish1456—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Glimmer
LMArena Instruction Following14631375

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Glimmer
LMArena Longer Query14631382

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Glimmer
LMArena Text14551389
LMArena Creative Writing14001339
LMArena Multi-Turn14511399

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Muse Glimmer?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Glimmer share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper