Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Muse Glimmer
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Muse Glimmer in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 38.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 12% for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and 2.6% for Muse Glimmer.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 48.5 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1637 | 1355 |
| SciCode | 51.3% | 44.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | 1416 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 12% | 2.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | 1396 |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1468 | 1417 |
| ProofBench | 63% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | 1386 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1475 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1375 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Muse Glimmer?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Glimmer share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.