Model comparison

Grok 4 vs Muse Glimmer

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 xAI

47.8

Rank #49 Confirmed

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.3

Rank #128 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 scores higher in 8 categories and Muse Glimmer in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 leads 63.1 to 42.1.
  • Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4 and Muse Glimmer specifications
Grok 4Muse Glimmer
ProviderxAIMeta
Noometry Index47.841.3
Released2025-07-09—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4813

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 49.9 (#44), Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Muse Glimmer
LMArena Coding14081417
Aider Polyglot79.6%—
LMArena WebDev—1355
WeirdML45.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4: 32.1 (#62), Muse Glimmer: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Muse Glimmer
Terminal-Bench27.2%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard63%—
GDPval21.1%—
Cybench43%—
DeepResearch Bench47.3%—
BALROG43.6%—
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons66.6%—

Reasoning Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 36.9 (#59), Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Muse Glimmer
LMArena Hard Prompts14091395
ARC-AGI-216%—
SimpleBench60.5%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark73.6%—
ARC-AGI-166.7%—
Chess Puzzles28%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.46—
ForecastBench60.9—

Math Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 46.5 (#58), Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Muse Glimmer
LMArena Math14221419
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584%—
Omni-MATH60.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)19.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 53.7 (#50), Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Muse Glimmer
LMArena Expert14171388
GPQA Diamond87%—
MMLU-Pro85.1%—
Confabulations12.4%—
GPQA (HELM)72.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4: 33.1 (#89), Muse Glimmer: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Muse Glimmer
LMArena Vision1211—
GeoBench45%—

Multilingual Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 52.0 (#98), Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Muse Glimmer
LMArena Non-English14031384
LMArena Chinese14281412
LMArena Russian14091393
LMArena French1418—
LMArena German1429—
LMArena Japanese1396—
LMArena Korean1376—
LMArena Spanish1419—

Instruction Following Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 79.4 (#4), Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Muse Glimmer
LMArena Instruction Following13871374
IFEval94.9%—

Long Context Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 63.1 (#4), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Muse Glimmer
LMArena Longer Query14091381
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—

Writing & Preference Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 58.7 (#111), Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Muse Glimmer
LMArena Text14121389
LMArena Creative Writing13971338
LMArena Multi-Turn14161398
Short-Story Creative Writing76.9%—
WildBench79.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 better than Muse Glimmer?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.9 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 and Muse Glimmer share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper