Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 36.5 to 17.0.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
ERNIE 5.0 0110MiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderBaiduXiaomi
Noometry Index41.848.5
Released—2026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked2019

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding14551504
LMArena WebDev—1637
SciCode—51.3%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts14451482
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
CritPt—12%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math14371468
ProofBench—63%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert14281501

Multimodal Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision12491259

Multilingual Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English14361434
LMArena Chinese15121511
LMArena French14671475
LMArena Russian14461409
LMArena Spanish14731456
LMArena German1460—
LMArena Japanese1382—
LMArena Korean1406—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14131463

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query14221463

Writing & Preference Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text14451455
LMArena Creative Writing14261400
LMArena Multi-Turn14341451

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper