Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 36.5 to 17.0.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 48.5 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1504 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1637 |
| SciCode | — | 51.3% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1482 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| CritPt | — | 12% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1468 |
| ProofBench | — | 63% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | 1501 |
Multimodal Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | 1259 |
Multilingual Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1511 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1456 |
| LMArena German | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1463 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1463 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 1451 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.