Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5 vs Muse Glimmer
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Muse Glimmer in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 43.6 to 38.7.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5 | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75), Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | 1355 |
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | 1417 |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98), Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | 1395 |
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |
Math Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145), Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1436 | 1419 |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109), Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1459 | 1388 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96), Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1393 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1412 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55), Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | 1374 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1444 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82), Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1338 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1398 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Muse Glimmer?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.5 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Muse Glimmer share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.