Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 4 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 28.6 to 17.0.
- MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 43.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1469 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1438 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1450 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1436 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | 1460 |
Multimodal Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | 1247 |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1468 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1460 | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | 1306 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1416 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1434 |
Long Context Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1445 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (43.0 vs 43.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and MiMo-V2.5 share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.