Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Muse Glimmer
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Muse Glimmer in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 57.5.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 41.7 |
| Released | — | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1396 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1417 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1386 |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1375 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Muse Glimmer?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.