Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

44.8

Rank #70 Confirmed

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

28.8

Rank #310 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.5 to 31.3.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct specifications
MiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderXiaomiMicrosoft
Noometry Index44.828.8
Released2026-04-222024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.43—
Output $ / M tokens$0.87—
Results tracked2732

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.4 (#313)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Coding15021102
LMArena WebDev1477—
SciCode50.2%—
LiveBench Coding—20.3%
ALE-Bench899.8—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.2 (#319)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14871100
NYT Connections (extended)34.4%—
CritPt4%—
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
DTBench84.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
LMCA29.5%—
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.1%
HellaSwag—77%
LiveBench—24%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 25.4 (#247)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Math14801151
ProofBench22%—
LiveBench Math—17.6%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#237)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Expert15011067
ARC (AI2) Challenge—90.7%
MMLU—75.7%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—58.1%

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.6 (#267)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14491058
LMArena Chinese15071061
LMArena French14891134
LMArena German14551080
LMArena Japanese1418966
LMArena Korean1436894
LMArena Russian14501111
LMArena Spanish14701111

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 52.2 (#287)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14771087
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%

Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#262)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14821088

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.3 (#279)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text14651110
LMArena Creative Writing14401083
LMArena Multi-Turn14771068
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1493—
EQ-Bench 41208—
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper