Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

29.0

Rank #319 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 40.0 to 10.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 53.6% for Claude 3 Sonnet and 84.5% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Sonnet and MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifications
Claude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Noometry Index29.045.2
Released2024-02-292026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked3027

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.6 (#302), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Coding12231503
LMArena WebDev—1479
SciCode—50.2%
WeirdML10.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
ALE-Bench—899.8
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 20.5 (#237), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts11971488
DTBench53.6%84.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—34.4%
CritPt—4%
LMCA—29.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.7—
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.7 (#310), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Math12131481
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
ProofBench—22%
MATH Level 518.2%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#276), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Expert11731503
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
MMLU75.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 25.2 (#125), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Vision984—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 37.8 (#234), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Non-English12051449
LMArena Chinese11891507
LMArena French12291488
LMArena German12041458
LMArena Japanese11311412
LMArena Korean11281437
LMArena Russian12271450
LMArena Spanish12041471

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 62.8 (#235), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following11991477

Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#228), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Longer Query12111483

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.1 (#238), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text12181465
LMArena Creative Writing11861440
LMArena Multi-Turn12271477
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1493
EQ-Bench 4—1208

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper