Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Nova Premier 1.0

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Nova Premier 1.0 Amazon

38.3

Rank #189 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.3 to 51.0.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Nova Premier 1.0 specifications
MiMo-V2.5-ProNova Premier 1.0
ProviderXiaomiAmazon
Noometry Index45.238.3
Released2026-04-222025-04-30
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1.05M1M
Max output131K10K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$2.50
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$12.50
Results tracked276

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProNova Premier 1.0
LMArena WebDev1479—
SciCode50.2%—
LMArena Coding1503—
ALE-Bench899.8—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130), Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProNova Premier 1.0
Kagi LLM Benchmark—44.8%
NYT Connections (extended)34.4%—
CritPt4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1488—
DTBench84.5%—
LMCA29.5%—

Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96), Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProNova Premier 1.0
ProofBench22%—
Omni-MATH—35%
LMArena Math1481—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98), Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProNova Premier 1.0
MMLU-Pro—72.6%
GPQA (HELM)—51.8%
LMArena Expert1503—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Non-English1449—
LMArena Chinese1507—
LMArena French1488—
LMArena German1458—
LMArena Japanese1412—
LMArena Korean1437—
LMArena Russian1450—
LMArena Spanish1471—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21), Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProNova Premier 1.0
IFEval—80.3%
LMArena Instruction Following1477—

Long Context Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Longer Query1483—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49), Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Text1465—
LMArena Creative Writing1440—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1493—
WildBench—78.8%
EQ-Bench 41208—
LMArena Multi-Turn1477—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Nova Premier 1.0?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Nova Premier 1.0?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Nova Premier 1.0 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and Nova Premier 1.0 has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper