Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Nova Premier 1.0
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Nova Premier 1.0 in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 56.0 to 35.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 70.3% for Gemini 2.5 Pro and 44.8% for Nova Premier 1.0.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is cheaper at $1.25 / $10 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | Nova Premier 1.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | |
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 38.3 |
| Released | 2025-03-25 | 2025-04-30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 10K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $12.50 |
| Results tracked | 78 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 53.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1227 | — |
| SciCode | 42.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 54% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 85.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1452 | — |
| CadEval | 64% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.52 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.51 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | — |
| GDPval | 23.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 0.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | — |
| BALROG | 43.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 55.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 573.64 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99), Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | 44.8% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41% | — |
| CritPt | 2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1455 | — |
| DTBench | 82.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.9% | — |
| LMCA | 34.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.32 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 82.3% | — |
Math Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213), Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 41.6% | 35% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 24.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.7% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 90.2% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1450 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 14.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46), Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | 72.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 74.9% | 51.8% |
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.6% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | — |
| GeoBench | 86% | — |
| VPCT | 48% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1421 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 44.7% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | — |
| LMArena French | 1472 | — |
| LMArena German | 1487 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1461 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1461 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75), Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84% | 80.3% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 91.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1449 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62), Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 85.7% | 78.8% |
| LMArena Text | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1454 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 67.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Nova Premier 1.0?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Nova Premier 1.0?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Nova Premier 1.0 share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Nova Premier 1.0 has 6.