Noometry

Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiniMax-M2.5

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2.5 MiniMax

38.3

Rank #188 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 7 categories and MiniMax-M2.5 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 40.0 to 26.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 22% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and 4% for MiniMax-M2.5.
  • Both cost about the same: $0.43 input and $0.87 output per million tokens.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.5-ProMiniMax-M2.5
ProviderXiaomiMiniMax
Noometry Index45.238.3
Released2026-04-222026-02-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M205K
Max output131K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$1.20
Results tracked2733

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60), MiniMax-M2.5: 48.1 (#58)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena WebDev14791387
LMArena Coding15031381
ALE-Bench899.8618.17
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—75.8%
SWE-bench Multilingual—68.3%
SciCode50.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —, MiniMax-M2.5: 30.4 (#77)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMiniMax-M2.5
Terminal-Bench—42.7%
Vending-Bench 2—-23.16

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130), MiniMax-M2.5: 17.5 (#292)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMiniMax-M2.5
NYT Connections (extended)34.4%16.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts14881372
ARC-AGI-2—4.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—55.2%
ARC-AGI-1—63.7%
CritPt4%—
DTBench84.5%—
LMCA29.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.68

Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96), MiniMax-M2.5: 26.9 (#253)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMiniMax-M2.5
ProofBench22%4%
LMArena Math14811378

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98), MiniMax-M2.5: 39.2 (#135)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Expert15031379
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.1%

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34), MiniMax-M2.5: 47.1 (#152)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Non-English14491338
LMArena Chinese15071393
LMArena French14881362
LMArena German14581362
LMArena Japanese14121171
LMArena Korean14371232
LMArena Russian14501358
LMArena Spanish14711354

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21), MiniMax-M2.5: 71.5 (#148)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Instruction Following14771353

Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37), MiniMax-M2.5: 37.5 (#216)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Longer Query14831366
CL-bench—11.4%
CL-bench Life—6.3%

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49), MiniMax-M2.5: 53.9 (#153)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Text14651359
LMArena Creative Writing14401331
EQ-Bench Creative Writing14931361
LMArena Multi-Turn14771364
EQ-Bench 41208—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than MiniMax-M2.5?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or MiniMax-M2.5?

MiniMax-M2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or MiniMax-M2.5 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (47.4 vs 48.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and MiniMax-M2.5 share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.5 has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper