Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Mistral Large 4

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI

43.1

Rank #99 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Mistral Large 4 in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 42.2 to 36.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 34.4% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and 27.4% for Mistral Large 4.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.68 / $2.09 for Mistral Large 4.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Mistral Large 4 specifications
MiMo-V2.5-ProMistral Large 4
ProviderXiaomiMistral AI
Noometry Index45.243.1
Released2026-04-222026-10-06
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1.05M1.05M
Max output131K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$0.68
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$2.09
Results tracked2715

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Large 4 leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60), Mistral Large 4: 48.6 (#57)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMistral Large 4
LMArena WebDev14791541
LMArena Coding15031475
SciCode50.2%—
ALE-Bench899.8—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130), Mistral Large 4: 22.5 (#192)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMistral Large 4
NYT Connections (extended)34.4%27.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts14881444
CritPt4%—
DTBench84.5%—
LMCA29.5%—

Math Too close to call

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96), Mistral Large 4: 40.4 (#91)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMistral Large 4
LMArena Math14811488
ProofBench22%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98), Mistral Large 4: 36.6 (#166)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMistral Large 4
LMArena Expert15031447
SimpleQA Verified—20%

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34), Mistral Large 4: 52.6 (#82)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMistral Large 4
LMArena Non-English14491415
LMArena Chinese15071491
LMArena Russian14501414
LMArena French1488—
LMArena German1458—
LMArena Japanese1412—
LMArena Korean1437—
LMArena Spanish1471—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21), Mistral Large 4: 75.0 (#76)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMistral Large 4
LMArena Instruction Following14771424

Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37), Mistral Large 4: 43.6 (#89)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMistral Large 4
LMArena Longer Query14831429

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49), Mistral Large 4: 60.4 (#97)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMistral Large 4
LMArena Text14651427
LMArena Creative Writing14401361
LMArena Multi-Turn14771424
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1493—
EQ-Bench 41208—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Mistral Large 4?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Mistral Large 4?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 4 lists at $0.68 and $2.09.

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Mistral Large 4 better for coding?

Mistral Large 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 47.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Mistral Large 4 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large 4 has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper