Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Mistral Large 4

Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Large 4 costs 3.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 2.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Google

45.0

Rank #75 Confirmed

Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI

43.1

Rank #99 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Mistral Large 4 in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 56.0 to 36.6.
  • Mistral Large 4 is cheaper at $0.68 / $2.09 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Side by side

Gemini 2.5 Pro and Mistral Large 4 specifications
Gemini 2.5 ProMistral Large 4
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Noometry Index45.043.1
Released2025-03-252026-10-06
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M1.05M
Max output66K262K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$0.68
Output $ / M tokens$10$2.09
Results tracked7815

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Large 4 leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101), Mistral Large 4: 48.6 (#57)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Large 4
LMArena WebDev12271541
LMArena Coding14521475
SWE-bench Verified57.6%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)53.6%—
Aider Polyglot83.1%—
SciCode42.8%—
GSO3.9%—
WeirdML54%—
LiveBench Coding85.9%—
CadEval64%—
ALE-Bench785.52—
AlgoTune1.51—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88), Mistral Large 4: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Large 4
Terminal-Bench32.6%—
GDPval23.3%—
Remote Labor Index0.8%—
TheAgentCompany30.3%—
τ²-bench Banking13.7%—
DeepResearch Bench42.8%—
BALROG43.3%—
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons55.4%—
Vending-Bench 2573.64—

Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99), Mistral Large 4: 22.5 (#192)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Large 4
LMArena Hard Prompts14551444
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
SimpleBench62.4%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark70.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)—27.4%
ARC-AGI-141%—
CritPt2%—
Chess Puzzles20%—
EnigmaEval5.6%—
LiveBench Reasoning89.8%—
DTBench82.4%—
LiveBench Data Analysis79.9%—
LMCA34.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.32—
ForecastBench61.3—
LiveBench82.3%—

Math Mistral Large 4 leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213), Mistral Large 4: 40.4 (#91)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Large 4
LMArena Math14501488
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)24.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 40%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584.7%—
Omni-MATH41.6%—
LiveBench Math90.2%—
MATH Level 595.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)14.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46), Mistral Large 4: 36.6 (#166)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Large 4
LMArena Expert14521447
GPQA Diamond85.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam21.6%—
SimpleQA Verified—20%
MMLU-Pro86.3%—
Confabulations10.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7%—
GPQA (HELM)74.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18), Mistral Large 4: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Large 4
LMArena Vision1263—
GeoBench86%—
VPCT48%—
LMArena Document1421—
SpatialViz-Bench44.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31), Mistral Large 4: 52.6 (#82)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Large 4
LMArena Non-English14511415
LMArena Chinese15071491
LMArena Russian14611414
LMArena French1472—
LMArena German1487—
LMArena Japanese1461—
LMArena Korean1434—
LMArena Spanish1473—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75), Mistral Large 4: 75.0 (#76)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Large 4
LMArena Instruction Following14371424
LiveBench Instruction Following80.6%—
IFEval84%—

Long Context Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5), Mistral Large 4: 43.6 (#89)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Large 4
LMArena Longer Query14491429
Fiction.LiveBench91.7%—

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62), Mistral Large 4: 60.4 (#97)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Large 4
LMArena Text14581427
LMArena Creative Writing14541361
LMArena Multi-Turn14531424
Short-Story Creative Writing83.8%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1421—
WildBench85.7%—
LiveBench Language67.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Mistral Large 4?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Large 4 costs 3.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 2.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Mistral Large 4?

Mistral Large 4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.68 per million input tokens and $2.09 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Pro lists at $1.25 and $10.

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Mistral Large 4 better for coding?

Mistral Large 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Mistral Large 4 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large 4 has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper