Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 42.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 47.0 to 41.2.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 42.6 | 44.8 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.2 (#119), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1419 | 1502 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1477 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 27.8 (#96), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1417 | 1487 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1480 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1501 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.1 (#78), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.5 (#118), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1383 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1507 |
| LMArena French | — | 1489 |
| LMArena German | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1418 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.9 (#110), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1398 | 1477 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#110), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1405 | 1482 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.4 (#95), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1407 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1389 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1423 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 42.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 41.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.