Model comparison
Mercury vs phi-3-medium 14B
Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mercury | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 29.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mercury leads
Mercury: 38.7 (#170), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | Mercury | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Mercury: 17.5 (#293), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Mercury | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 21.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1285 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Not comparable
Mercury: —, phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Mercury | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mercury: —, phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Mercury | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mercury: 41.6 (#206), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Mercury | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1260 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mercury: 65.2 (#224), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Mercury | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Mercury: 38.4 (#198), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Mercury | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Mercury: 46.2 (#221), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Mercury | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1191 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1282 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mercury better than phi-3-medium 14B?
Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Mercury or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Mercury and phi-3-medium 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.