Model comparison
Mercury vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Mercury leads 38.7 to 28.6.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mercury | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 29.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mercury leads
Mercury: 38.7 (#170), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Mercury | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | — |
Reasoning Mercury leads
Mercury: 17.5 (#293), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Mercury | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 21.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1285 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Not comparable
Mercury: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Mercury | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mercury: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Mercury | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mercury: 41.6 (#206), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Mercury | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1260 | — |
Instruction Following Mercury leads
Mercury: 65.2 (#224), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Mercury | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Mercury: 38.4 (#198), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Mercury | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | — |
Writing & Preference Mercury leads
Mercury: 46.2 (#221), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Mercury | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1191 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1282 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mercury better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Mercury or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Mercury and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.