Model comparison
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs phi-3-medium 14B
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 33.9 to 9.1.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-08-13 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1255 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1265 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1238 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1257 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1262 | — |
| LMArena French | 1286 | — |
| LMArena German | 1273 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1195 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1279 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than phi-3-medium 14B?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.0 vs 36.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and phi-3-medium 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.