Model comparison

Mercury 2 vs Nemotron 3 Super

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Mercury 2 Inception

39.1

Rank #175 Confirmed

Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA

40.1

Rank #153 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury 2 scores higher in 1 category and Nemotron 3 Super in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 39.4 to 33.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 43.2% for Mercury 2 and 38% for Nemotron 3 Super.
  • Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $0.75 for Mercury 2.
  • Nemotron 3 Super accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
  • Nemotron 3 Super has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mercury 2 and Nemotron 3 Super specifications
Mercury 2Nemotron 3 Super
ProviderInceptionNVIDIA
Noometry Index39.140.1
Released2026-02-202026-03-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window128K262K
Max output50K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.25$0.08
Output $ / M tokens$0.75$0.45
Results tracked1721

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3 Super leads

Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255), Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Nemotron 3 Super
SciCode38.7%36%
WeirdML43.2%38%
LMArena Coding13911403
ALE-Bench785.58213.9
LMArena WebDev1171—

Reasoning Mercury 2 leads

Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170), Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Nemotron 3 Super
CritPt0.8%3.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts13621386
NYT Connections (extended)—15.4%

Math Not comparable

Mercury 2: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Nemotron 3 Super
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.4%
LMArena Math—1380

Knowledge Nemotron 3 Super leads

Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Expert13581398
Vectara Hallucination Rate12.3%—

Multilingual Nemotron 3 Super leads

Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157), Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Non-English13311355
LMArena Chinese14171432
LMArena Russian13041336
LMArena French—1405
LMArena German—1341
LMArena Spanish—1417

Instruction Following Too close to call

Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165), Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Instruction Following13291347

Long Context Nemotron 3 Super leads

Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154), Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Longer Query13301362

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Super leads

Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155), Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text13551378
LMArena Creative Writing12891317
LMArena Multi-Turn13581369

Frequently asked questions

Is Mercury 2 better than Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Mercury 2 or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Mercury 2 lists at $0.25 and $0.75.

Is Mercury 2 or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?

Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3 Super does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Mercury 2 and Nemotron 3 Super share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper