Noometry

Model comparison

Magistral Medium vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

35.2

Rank #227 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 8.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 0.3% for Magistral Medium and 26.6% for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

Magistral MediumMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderMistral AIXiaomi
Noometry Index35.250.3
Released2025-03-172026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K1.05M
Max output16K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$5$0.87
Results tracked2219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.6-Pro
SciCode39.2%60.9%
LMArena Coding13191534
LMArena WebDev—1629
ALE-Bench—1,158

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Magistral Medium: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.6-Pro
CritPt0.3%26.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts12671512
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark16.2%—
ARC-AGI-16.1%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Math12501494
ProofBench—70%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert12231543

Multimodal Not comparable

Magistral Medium: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1264

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English12321474
LMArena Chinese12271529
LMArena Russian12241480
LMArena French1267—
LMArena German1248—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1125—
LMArena Spanish1271—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following12541493

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query12951501

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text12551492
LMArena Creative Writing12451468
LMArena Multi-Turn12751464

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Medium better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.

Is Magistral Medium or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper