Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 15.2.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 50.3 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1534 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
Agentic & Tool Use MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1512 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1494 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1543 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | 1264 |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1493 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1501 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1464 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.