Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 37.8.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3.7 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 45.0 |
| Released | — | 2026-06-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.0 (#123), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1413 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 27.3 (#110), Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1460 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.39 |
Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 36.2 (#121), Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1425 | 1467 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 37.8 (#142), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1385 | 1467 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1281 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.7 (#127), Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1405 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1426 | 1471 |
| LMArena German | 1391 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1355 | 1411 |
| LMArena Korean | 1327 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1371 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1381 | 1453 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.3 (#136), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1365 | 1439 |
Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#128), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1370 | 1454 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.9 (#131), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1394 | 1454 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1318 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | 1459 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.