Noometry

Model comparison

Longcat Flash Chat vs Qwen3-1.7B

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Qwen3-1.7B Alibaba (Qwen)

26.6

Rank #336 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 39.4 to 16.3.

Side by side

Longcat Flash ChatQwen3-1.7B
ProviderMeituanAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.126.6
Released—2025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked194

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), Qwen3-1.7B: —

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Coding1471—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3-1.7B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.4%

Reasoning Too close to call

Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3-1.7B
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)17.7%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1440—

Math Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3-1.7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—8.1%
LMArena Math1442—

Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3-1.7B
GPQA Diamond—38%
LMArena Expert1454—

Multilingual Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), Qwen3-1.7B: —

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Non-English1404—
LMArena Chinese1465—
LMArena French1456—
LMArena German1408—
LMArena Japanese1373—
LMArena Korean1371—
LMArena Russian1395—
LMArena Spanish1445—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), Qwen3-1.7B: —

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Instruction Following1411—

Long Context Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), Qwen3-1.7B: —

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Longer Query1425—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), Qwen3-1.7B: —

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Text1427—
LMArena Creative Writing1388—
LMArena Multi-Turn1418—

Frequently asked questions

Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Qwen3-1.7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.

Related comparisons

Go deeper