Model comparison
Longcat Flash Chat vs Qwen Turbo
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 39.4 to 15.3.
- Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meituan | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 27.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1471 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 43.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 17.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | — |
Math Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1442 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1454 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | — |
| LMArena French | 1456 | — |
| LMArena German | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1371 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1445 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1425 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Qwen Turbo?
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.