Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Qwen3-1.7B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 39.0 to 16.3.
- Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 26.6 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.6 (#123), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1412 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 28.4 (#106), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | — |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 39.0 (#119), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1425 | — |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 38.5 (#144), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.5 (#131), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | — |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1360 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1324 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1371 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1382 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.1 (#141), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1365 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#133), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1370 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.6 (#136), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1394 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1318 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Qwen3-1.7B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Qwen3-1.7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.