Model comparison
Qwen Turbo vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 6.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Solar Pro4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
UpstageSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Solar Pro4 leads 38.8 to 15.3.
- Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for Solar Pro4.
- Qwen Turbo accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 524K.
Side by side
| Qwen Turbo | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2024-11-01 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 524K |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.05 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.20 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen Turbo: —, Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Qwen Turbo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1437 |
Reasoning Not comparable
Qwen Turbo: —, Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Qwen Turbo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1399 |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Qwen Turbo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 6.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1416 |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.2% | — |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Qwen Turbo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1427 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen Turbo: —, Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Qwen Turbo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1415 |
| LMArena French | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen Turbo: —, Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Qwen Turbo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1377 |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen Turbo: —, Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Qwen Turbo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen Turbo: —, Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Qwen Turbo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen Turbo better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 6.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Solar Pro4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Qwen Turbo or Solar Pro4?
Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Solar Pro4 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Turbo does, with 1M tokens against 524K.
How many benchmarks do Qwen Turbo and Solar Pro4 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Turbo has 3 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.