Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Longcat Flash Chat

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 1 category and Longcat Flash Chat in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.0 to 51.7.
  • Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLongcat Flash Chat
ProviderGoogleMeituan
Noometry Index37.842.1
Released2025-02-05—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Coding13221471
LiveBench Coding47.1%—

Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts13241440
Kagi LLM Benchmark—43.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—17.7%
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Longcat Flash Chat leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Math13091442
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—

Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Expert13051454
MMLU-Pro72%—
GPQA (HELM)50%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Longcat Flash Chat: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Vision1100—

Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Non-English13231404
LMArena Chinese13391465
LMArena French13471456
LMArena German13061408
LMArena Japanese13011373
LMArena Korean13251371
LMArena Russian13281395
LMArena Spanish13131445

Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Instruction Following13051411
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—

Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Longer Query13201425

Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Text13301427
LMArena Creative Writing13191388
LMArena Multi-Turn13071418
WildBench79%—
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Longcat Flash Chat?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Longcat Flash Chat share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper