Model comparison
Longcat Flash Chat vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.0 to 25.8.
Side by side
| Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meituan | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 30.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1471 | 1016 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | 993 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 43.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 17.7% | — |
Math Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1018 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1454 | — |
Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 947 |
| LMArena French | 1456 | — |
| LMArena German | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1371 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1445 | — |
Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1425 | — |
Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | 1007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Longcat Flash Chat or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.