Model comparison
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs MiniMax M1
MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax M1 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax M1 leads 53.3 to 31.8.
Side by side
| Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | MiniMax M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 31.2 | 39.7 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax M1 leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.3 (#295), MiniMax M1: 39.2 (#149)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | 1359 |
Reasoning MiniMax M1 leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 19.1 (#245), MiniMax M1: 25.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | 1340 |
Math MiniMax M1 leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#223), MiniMax M1: 34.8 (#152)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1072 | 1360 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, MiniMax M1: 35.7 (#168)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1316 |
Multilingual MiniMax M1 leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.9 (#265), MiniMax M1: 46.0 (#157)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1064 | 1320 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1361 |
| LMArena French | — | 1369 |
| LMArena German | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1220 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1330 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1354 |
Instruction Following MiniMax M1 leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.5 (#274), MiniMax M1: 69.5 (#169)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1061 | 1312 |
Long Context MiniMax M1 leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#283), MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#136)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | 1326 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 69.4% |
Writing & Preference MiniMax M1 leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.8 (#278), MiniMax M1: 53.3 (#155)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | 1343 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1298 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | 1335 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than MiniMax M1?
MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or MiniMax M1 better for coding?
MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.2 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and MiniMax M1 share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.