Model comparison
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.0 to 31.6.
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 45.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | 1487 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | 1483 |
Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1072 | 1474 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1489 |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1063 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1534 |
| LMArena French | — | 1484 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | 1467 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | 1476 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.