Model comparison
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 30.8 to 10.6.
Side by side
| Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 45.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 105K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1487 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 6.5% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 20.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1483 |
Math Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1474 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1489 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1534 |
| LMArena French | — | 1484 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1467 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1476 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1464 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.