Noometry

Model comparison

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.2

Rank #265 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.0

Rank #66 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 64.5 to 31.8.
  • Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama2 70b Steerlm ChatQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.245.0
Released—2026-06-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked932

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.3 (#295), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding10251473
FrontierCode—10.2%
SciCode—45.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatQwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 19.1 (#245), Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts10471460
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84%
LMCA—37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.39

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#223), Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Math10721467
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatQwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond—87.9%
LMArena Expert—1467

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1281
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.9 (#265), Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English10641445
LMArena Chinese—1510
LMArena French—1471
LMArena German—1471
LMArena Japanese—1411
LMArena Korean—1416
LMArena Russian—1457
LMArena Spanish—1453

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.5 (#274), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following10611439

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#283), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query9981454

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.8 (#278), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text10981454
LMArena Creative Writing10911439
LMArena Multi-Turn10581459

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper