Model comparison
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Qwen Plus
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Plus in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Plus leads 52.4 to 31.8.
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.2 | 36.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen Plus leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.3 (#295), Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | 1328 |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 19.1 (#245), Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
Math Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#223), Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1072 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |
Multilingual Qwen Plus leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.9 (#265), Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1064 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |
Instruction Following Qwen Plus leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.5 (#274), Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1061 | 1303 |
Long Context Qwen Plus leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#283), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | 1325 |
Writing & Preference Qwen Plus leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.8 (#278), Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | 1336 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Qwen Plus?
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Qwen Plus share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.