Model comparison
o1-pro vs Qwen Plus
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen Plus leads 28.4 to 20.4.
- Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| o1-pro | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.5 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2025-03-19 | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Max output | 100K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $150 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $600 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1328 |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
o1-pro: 20.4 (#239), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 23.3% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 6.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1317 |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
Math Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge o1-pro leads
o1-pro: 29.7 (#234), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |
Multilingual Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1303 |
Long Context Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1324 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1336 |
Frequently asked questions
Is o1-pro better than Qwen Plus?
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, o1-pro or Qwen Plus?
Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do o1-pro and Qwen Plus share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-pro has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.