Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Qwen Plus

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

Qwen Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

37.1

Rank #210 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Plus in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Plus leads 52.2 to 31.1.
  • Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Qwen Plus specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructQwen Plus
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.637.1
Released—2024-01-25
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1420

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen Plus leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen Plus
LMArena Coding11121328
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%—

Reasoning Qwen Plus leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts10921317
Kagi LLM Benchmark—63.3%
DTBench—81.1%
LMCA—24%

Math Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen Plus
LMArena Math11431326
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—17.8%
MATH Level 5—65.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen Plus
LMArena Expert10871328
GPQA Diamond—48.1%

Multilingual Qwen Plus leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen Plus
LMArena Non-English10371310
LMArena Chinese10631347
LMArena Russian10601323
LMArena Japanese—1251

Instruction Following Qwen Plus leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen Plus
LMArena Instruction Following10881303

Long Context Qwen Plus leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen Plus
LMArena Longer Query11221324

Writing & Preference Qwen Plus leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen Plus
LMArena Text10961326
LMArena Creative Writing10711293
LMArena Multi-Turn10631336

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Qwen Plus share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper