Model comparison

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs o1-mini

o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.0 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.8

Rank #268 Confirmed

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 1 category and o1-mini in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o1-mini leads 48.4 to 31.6.
  • Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and o1-mini specifications
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chato1-mini
ProviderNVIDIAOpenAI
Noometry Index31.834.0
Released—2024-09-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked939

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1-mini leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm Chato1-mini
LMArena Coding10251362
Aider Polyglot—32.9%
WeirdML—36.3%
LiveBench Coding—48%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—78.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm Chato1-mini
Cybench—10%

Reasoning Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm Chato1-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts10471333
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—18.1%
ARC-AGI-1—14%
LiveBench Reasoning—72.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—135.82
LiveBench—57.8%

Math o1-mini leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm Chato1-mini
LMArena Math10721358
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—46.9%
LiveBench Math—62%
MATH Level 5—89.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm Chato1-mini
GPQA Diamond—62.4%
Confabulations—18.6%
LMArena Expert—1316

Multilingual o1-mini leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm Chato1-mini
LMArena Non-English10631289
LMArena Chinese—1314
LMArena French—1293
LMArena German—1278
LMArena Japanese—1245
LMArena Korean—1223
LMArena Russian—1283
LMArena Spanish—1303

Instruction Following o1-mini leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm Chato1-mini
LMArena Instruction Following10601304
LiveBench Instruction Following—65.4%

Long Context o1-mini leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm Chato1-mini
LMArena Longer Query9981320

Writing & Preference o1-mini leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm Chato1-mini
LMArena Text10981317
LMArena Creative Writing10911244
LMArena Multi-Turn10581314
Short-Story Creative Writing—64.9%
LiveBench Language—40.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than o1-mini?

o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.0 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or o1-mini better for coding?

o1-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and o1-mini share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper