Model comparison
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs o1-mini
o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.6 to 48.6.
Side by side
| Mistral Medium 3.1 | o1-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 31.5 | 33.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 105K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, o1-mini: 35.1 (#218)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 36.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 48% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1362 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 78.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, o1-mini: 24.3 (#112)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
Reasoning Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336), o1-mini: 8.9 (#340)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 18.1% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 6.5% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 14% |
| Thematic Generalization | 20.3% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 72.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1333 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 57.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.82 |
| LiveBench | — | 57.8% |
Math Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, o1-mini: 33.7 (#168)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 46.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 62% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1358 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 89.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, o1-mini: 34.8 (#180)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 62.4% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1316 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, o1-mini: 43.8 (#177)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1289 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena French | — | 1292 |
| LMArena German | — | 1278 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1245 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1223 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1302 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, o1-mini: 67.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 65.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1304 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, o1-mini: 40.1 (#156)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1321 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140), o1-mini: 48.6 (#196)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1244 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 64.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1314 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 40.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than o1-mini?
o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.1 and o1-mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.