Model comparison

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Mixtral 8x7B

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.2

Rank #265 Confirmed

Mixtral 8x7B Mistral AI

26.8

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 3 categories and Mixtral 8x7B in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads 28.8 to 17.2.

Side by side

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Mixtral 8x7B specifications
Llama2 70b Steerlm ChatMixtral 8x7B
ProviderNVIDIAMistral AI
Noometry Index31.226.8
Released—2023-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—32K
Max output—32K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$0.70
Results tracked938

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mixtral 8x7B leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.3 (#295), Mixtral 8x7B: 32.2 (#265)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Coding10251127
HumanEval+—39.6%
MBPP+—49.7%

Reasoning Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 19.1 (#245), Mixtral 8x7B: 17.4 (#283)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Hard Prompts10471115
DTBench—49.6%
Adversarial NLI—55.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.38
ForecastBench—56.3
HellaSwag—86.7%
PIQA—83.6%
WinoGrande—77.2%

Math Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#223), Mixtral 8x7B: 17.2 (#284)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Math10721147
Omni-MATH—10.5%
MATH Level 5—10%
GSM8K—74.4%

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#296)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMixtral 8x7B
GPQA Diamond—30.6%
MMLU-Pro—33.5%
GPQA (HELM)—29.6%
LMArena Expert—1088
ARC (AI2) Challenge—87.3%
MMLU—70.6%
OpenBookQA—85.8%
TriviaQA—82.2%

Multilingual Too close to call

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.9 (#265), Mixtral 8x7B: 29.8 (#261)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Non-English10641077
LMArena Chinese—1055
LMArena French—1165
LMArena German—1114
LMArena Japanese—931
LMArena Korean—968
LMArena Russian—1090
LMArena Spanish—1110

Instruction Following Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.5 (#274), Mixtral 8x7B: 51.2 (#292)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Instruction Following10611110
IFEval—57.5%

Long Context Mixtral 8x7B leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#283), Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#255)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Longer Query9981103

Writing & Preference Mixtral 8x7B leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.8 (#278), Mixtral 8x7B: 34.4 (#265)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Text10981132
LMArena Creative Writing10911109
LMArena Multi-Turn10581115
WildBench—67.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Mixtral 8x7B?

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Mixtral 8x7B better for coding?

Mixtral 8x7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Mixtral 8x7B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x7B has 38.

Related comparisons

Go deeper