Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
NVIDIASummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads 31.3 to 11.1.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 31.8 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1025 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1047 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |
Math Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1072 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1063 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1060 |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 998 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1058 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.