Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Google
NVIDIASummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads 31.3 to 9.3.
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 31.8 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1025 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1047 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1072 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1063 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1060 |
Long Context Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 998 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1058 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?
Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.