Model comparison

Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)

Llama 4 Scout has enough public results to be ranked (#330); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Llama 4 Scout Meta

27.7

Rank #330 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.

Side by side

Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) specifications
Llama 4 ScoutQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.7—
Released2025-04-052024-09-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.30—
Results tracked436

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 4 Scout: 20.2 (#339), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)9.1%—
SciCode17%—
LMArena Coding1286—
BigCodeBench Complete43.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 4 Scout: 24.6 (#119), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard28.1%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Llama 4 Scout: 9.1 (#345), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Epoch Capabilities Index129.64113.14
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark36.9%—
ARC-AGI-10.5%—
CritPt0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1266—
DTBench57.9%—
LMCA12%—
ForecastBench57.5—
HellaSwag—76.8%
WinoGrande—72.9%

Math Not comparable

Llama 4 Scout: 19.6 (#286), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20257.8%—
Omni-MATH37.3%—
LMArena Math1287—
MATH Level 562.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0%—
GSM8K—86.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 4 Scout: 31.9 (#217), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
GPQA Diamond51.8%—
MMLU-Pro74.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.7%—
GPQA (HELM)50.7%—
LMArena Expert1235—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—60.9%
MMLU—68%

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 4 Scout: 32.2 (#102), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Vision1118—
SpatialViz-Bench34.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 4 Scout: 41.0 (#212), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Non-English1252—
LMArena Chinese1255—
LMArena French1282—
LMArena German1272—
LMArena Japanese1206—
LMArena Korean1207—
LMArena Russian1263—
LMArena Spanish1278—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 4 Scout: 65.8 (#217), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
IFEval81.8%—
LMArena Instruction Following1248—

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#294), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Fiction.LiveBench36%—
LMArena Longer Query1265—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 4 Scout: 37.0 (#261), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Text1279—
LMArena Creative Writing1249—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing783—
WildBench78%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1280—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 4 Scout better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?

Llama 4 Scout has enough public results to be ranked (#330); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 4 Scout has 43 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper