Model comparison

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#328); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both.

Side by side

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) specifications
Phi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.9—
Released2024-04-232024-09-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked356

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LiveBench Coding15.5%—
LMArena Coding1093—
HumanEval+59.1%—
MBPP+54.2%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
HellaSwag76.7%76.8%
WinoGrande70.8%72.9%
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning26.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1072—
LiveBench Data Analysis34.7%—
Adversarial NLI52.8%—
BIG-Bench Hard71.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—113.14
LiveBench22.4%—

Math Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LiveBench Math15.7%—
LMArena Math1111—
GSM8K—86.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
ARC (AI2) Challenge84.9%60.9%
MMLU68.8%68%
LMArena Expert1045—
OpenBookQA88%—
TriviaQA64%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Non-English1021—
LMArena Chinese1021—
LMArena French1076—
LMArena German1044—
LMArena Japanese935—
LMArena Korean905—
LMArena Russian1022—
LMArena Spanish1085—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LiveBench Instruction Following39.1%—
LMArena Instruction Following1053—

Long Context Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Longer Query1044—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Text1073—
LMArena Creative Writing1037—
LMArena Multi-Turn1018—
LiveBench Language9.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#328); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper