Model comparison

Llama 4 Scout vs Muse Glimmer

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Llama 4 Scout Meta

27.4

Rank #323 Confirmed

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.3

Rank #128 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 4 Scout scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.7 to 37.1.

Side by side

Llama 4 Scout and Muse Glimmer specifications
Llama 4 ScoutMuse Glimmer
ProviderMetaMeta
Noometry Index27.441.3
Released2025-04-05—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.30—
Results tracked4313

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Glimmer leads

Llama 4 Scout: 19.9 (#334), Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMuse Glimmer
LMArena Coding12861417
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)9.1%—
LMArena WebDev—1355
SciCode17%—
BigCodeBench Complete43.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 4 Scout: 24.4 (#109), Muse Glimmer: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMuse Glimmer
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard28.1%—

Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads

Llama 4 Scout: 9.2 (#339), Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMuse Glimmer
LMArena Hard Prompts12661395
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark36.9%—
ARC-AGI-10.5%—
CritPt0%—
DTBench57.9%—
LMCA12%—
Epoch Capabilities Index129.64—
ForecastBench57.5—

Math Muse Glimmer leads

Llama 4 Scout: 18.4 (#280), Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMuse Glimmer
LMArena Math12861419
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20257.8%—
Omni-MATH37.3%—
MATH Level 562.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0%—

Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads

Llama 4 Scout: 31.8 (#208), Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMuse Glimmer
LMArena Expert12361388
GPQA Diamond51.8%—
MMLU-Pro74.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.7%—
GPQA (HELM)50.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 4 Scout: 31.6 (#98), Muse Glimmer: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMuse Glimmer
LMArena Vision1118—
SpatialViz-Bench34.2%—

Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads

Llama 4 Scout: 41.3 (#207), Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMuse Glimmer
LMArena Non-English12531384
LMArena Chinese12561412
LMArena Russian12631393
LMArena French1283—
LMArena German1274—
LMArena Japanese1209—
LMArena Korean1207—
LMArena Spanish1277—

Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads

Llama 4 Scout: 66.0 (#212), Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMuse Glimmer
LMArena Instruction Following12481374
IFEval81.8%—

Long Context Muse Glimmer leads

Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#289), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMuse Glimmer
LMArena Longer Query12651381
Fiction.LiveBench36%—

Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads

Llama 4 Scout: 37.1 (#256), Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMuse Glimmer
LMArena Text12791389
LMArena Creative Writing12491338
LMArena Multi-Turn12811398
EQ-Bench Creative Writing783—
WildBench78%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 4 Scout better than Muse Glimmer?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 4 Scout or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 19.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 4 Scout and Muse Glimmer share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 4 Scout has 43 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper